Webworthy Usenet Rants and Email Degreetings
This page is just for posting some of the more impressive rantings of Dubya's
supporters. Also, I should include the negative email feedback from the
Web site, though most of them have been pretty boring rants. Basically,
I've tried to leave them just as the authors wrote them, even for the trivial
cosmetic idiocies. If your an optimistic American (like I used to be),
you'd probably prefer to doubt their veracity, but I'm sorry to say, these
writings really are authentic, and there really are some dumb and vicious
people out there.
(This was a newsgroup post. The first part is from me, followed by the
peak rant. At least I can't imagine he'll manage a better one. One mechanical
mystery is why the peculiar, even abnormal, bracketed handling of the tiny
bits that were snipped from one of my earlier posts. He's apparently posting
from Google, and its default quote format is fairly normal.)
5 May 2004
Finally! The pseudo-patriot's blathering has gotten up to the level of
being worthy of inclusion on my Web site. There's a special section to
demonstrate just how stupid and vicious many of Dubya's supporters are. To
insure Dubya's rousting in November, I really do wish such defenders of Dubya as
this "Mark F" got wider publicity. For the sake of copyright considerations, I
won't include the original post directly in the Web site, but I hereby include
it by reference as part of my "academic commentary" in this post. As the author
of this post, there is no question of its copyright. (And I insure you that the
pseudo-patriot's rant is included intact below, and that such a fool really does
seem to exist in Dubya's camp. Though it is not a strong proof of the
authenticity of authorship, I've included the headers, too. To really prove the
authenticity would probably require an expensive psychiatric report after he
entered therapy.)
My actual commentary is to say that the vigorous and almost immediate
response must have been triggered by the closing reference to masturbation.
Apparently the pseudo-patriot didn't like the insinuation that people like
him do it while reading the news. Either that, or it's his payment schedule. (I
still consider it possible that some rich old fart is paying the pseudo-patriot
for his personal efforts to disrupt and destroy the American democracy, but that
wouldn't diminish the sincerity of his insane ranting.)
Now that we've gone past the disruption part, the actual new issue can be
addressed in an open and democratic way. No, the pseudo-patriot did not actually
draw me back, but just a bit more spleen to be vented from the latest news.
This new item is actually part of the old issue of the relationship between the
problems in Israel and the problems in the rest of the Arab world--which remains
as one of Al Qaeda's favorite recruiting pitches. The latest news announces that
BushCo now wants to back away from last month's extremely provocative support of
Sharon's unilateral and non-negotiated "solution". This should be bad news for
Al Qaeda's current recruiting efforts in Iraq--except for the hypocrisy aspect.
It only comes after Sharon failed to get the support of his own party. The
mysterious part should be why Dubya cares so much about trying to interfere in
Israel's domestic politics, though the answer the Al Qaeda extremists will give
is quite obvious (and simpleminded): "See! America hates all Moslems!"
Of course that's an excessive and absurd claim. While it is true that there
is a small but noisy faction (the pseudo-patriot and his wannabe Brownshirt
associates) that does hate all Moslems (though they hate lots of other people,
too, including the thus-honored yours truly), most Americans are much more
moderate and reasonable. Unfortunately, by increasing the appearance of American
bias on one side, it makes it that much easier for the extremists on the other
side to recruit more extremists. Sad, but perhaps a natural reflection of the
increasing polarization within America. Dubya the uniter? That's a laugh. A very
sad laugh.
Haven't seen much in the American press, but there were several new British
articles about "exit strategies". The confusing part is that it appears the UN
is willing to get involved again. Didn't Dubya just kick those "irrelevant" UN
politicos out of there? I guess it's just pragmatic. The UN does have the job of
trying to stop the slaughter no matter how it got started, but I really don't
see where they can get the physical resources to clean up such a stupendous mess
as Dubya has made. If America can't afford to pay for it, where will the UN get
the money? Also, it seems to contradict BushCo's latest activation and
deployment orders for about 45,000 more soldiers for Iraq. However, that still
won't bring the numbers up to the troop levels the general told BushCo that they
would need--before they fired him.
--
"Wars are caused by undefended wealth." -- Ernest Hemingway
> Shannon Jacobs pontificates:
>
> << While it is
sometimes amusing to speculate about
> such deviant personalities and
their twisted motivations>>
>
> Like your impotence leading
you into your worshipping Osama bin Laden,
> wanker?
>
>
> <<it's much better to stay focused on the actual
issues.>>
>
> That would be nice, Shannon, if you had any
idea of what the word
> "issue" meant to begin with.
>
>
> <<Remember that democracy only works if there is real discussion
of
> the real
> issues>>
>
> What "real issues",
wacko? Your hatred of an American administration
> which made lots and
lots of mistakes, but at least is not as lunatic,
> self-hating and
separated from reality as you are?
>
>
> <<The new
development is the letter of condemnation of Dubya's
> performance
in
> Iraq. It seems to be basically an expression of solidarity with
the
> similar
> letter sent to Tony Blair recently.>>
>
> What, that a bunch of so-called experts, notoriously fed by
Arabist
> bribes, and who were unable FOR DECADES to bring about ANY exit
from
> the deadly Middle East stalemate disagree with Blair and Bush who
at
> least try something new? That you are an idiot is not your fault,
my
> deluded friend, but that you are an idiot who thinks he's
brilliant
> makes you seem even more pathetic that you would anyway be.
Yuck.
>
>
> <<Interestingly, I had speculated that the
prisoner-related war crimes
> may have been more widespread, and latest
reports seem to be
> confirming my speculations.>>
>
>
I would believe your concern, and I have spared myself no words in
>
condemning the abuses committed by American soldiers in Iraq, weren't
>
you and your Saddamist friends so quick in getting over any war crime,
>
"peace crime" and imaginable kind of crime which was *not* committed
> by
Americans (or Israelis). There you show your true colors, pathetic
>
America-hater, rubbing your insufficient brains against reality in the
>
comfort offered by the cyberspace.
>
> <<I actually think
that education is probably the area where they are
> doing the most
long-term damage, but it will take decades to assess
> that
damage.>>
>
> If you've ever been allowed to graduate from a
high school, you've
> spoken the truth, pal. You and your Islamofascist
buddies are indeed
> the epitome of how degraded the American system of
education became.
>
> <<Technically, I'm classified as one of
the last Vietnam-Era veterans,
> but if I'd arrived in boot camp a few
days later, I would have been
> post-Vietnam.>>
>
> Do
you mean that you've washed latrines in the last three days of the
>
Vietnam war, kiddo? You are technically classified as a sick idiot
>
hating his country, and lying openly in order to support his twisted
>
ideologies. Get professional help, bro, but don't expect sympathy.
>
> <<Anyway, my understanding of Moslems (and Jews) is that they
are
> definitely big on eye-for-an-eye justice, so (from that
perspective)
> his torture of them "justifies" their torture of
us.>>
>
> More anti-semitic rubbish from pseudo-Jewish junk.
Was your mother a
> kappo in a concentration camp perchance? Was she
giving head in
> exchange for her pathetic progeny being spared his life,
so he can
> pursue her "noble" goals further?
>
>
<<When I was in the service, if the pooch got screwed on my watch,
the
> answer was "Sir, no excuse, sir!" It didn't matter why. It was my
job
> to protect the pooch, and if I failed, I expected to be held
fully
> accountable.>>
>
> So did you get slapped when
you left that latrine dirty? You seem such
> a yellow piece of cowardly
garbage that you are incapable of cleaning
> a latrine, don't even mention
fight an enemy.
>
> <<My comments here have reflected
"catching up on the news" after
> being rather too busy to worry about it,
but these days reading the
> news has become a form of self-abuse,
regardless of your political
> position.>>
>
>
Self-abuse, not thinking nor respecting your country which tolerates
> and
protects you even in your pathetic state, seems to be the only
> endeavor
you are indeed familiar with, to an excessive extent even.
> Enjoy your
vacation and, if you go to Japan, try to get a half a brain
> trasplant.
It would be a better alternative than your present state of
>
"mind".
>
> -Mark